Al-Bursan, I. S., Kirkegaard, E. O., Fuerst, J., Bakhiet, S. F. A., Al Qudah, M. F., Hassan, E. M. A. H., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2019). Sex differences in 32,347 Jordanian 4th graders on the national exam of mathematicsJournal of Individual Differences40(2), 71-81. DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000278

Anders, J., Henderson, M., Moulton, V., & Sullivan, A. (2018). The role of schools in explaining individuals’ subject choices at age 14. Oxford Review of Education, 44(1), 75-93. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2018.1409973

Andersen, S., Ertac, S., Gneezy, U., List, J. A., & Maximiano, S. (2013). Gender, competitiveness, and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Review of Economics and Statistics95(4), 1438-1443. DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00312

Anderson, M. (2015, December 22). The resurgence of single-sex education. The Atlantic. Retrieved from:

AQR International. (2021, June). Soft skills development and gender: An analysis of mental toughness at UK independent schools. Chester, UK: AQR International. Retrieved from:

Archard, N. (2012). Adolescent girls and leadership: The impact of confidence, competition, and failure. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 17(4), 189-203. DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2011.649431

Archard, N. (2018). Gender equality and the purposeful education of girls. In Alliance, Vol 60, 46-49.

Australian Council for Educational Research. (2008). Senior secondary achievement in member schools of the Alliance of Girls’ Schools. Camberwell, Vic: ACER.

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). My School. Retrieved from:

Bagshaw, E. (2015, May 27). Schools teach coding to get ahead of the pack. Retrieved from:

Belfi, B., Goos, M., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2011). The effect of class composition by gender and ability on secondary school students’ school well-being and academic self-concept. A literature review. Educational research review. Retrieved from:

Bell, S., O’Halloran, K., Saw, J., & Zhao, Y. (2009). Women in science: Maximising productivity, diversity and innovation. Canberra: Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies [now Science and Technology Australia].

Best, S., Pearson, P., & Webb, P. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the effects of single-sex and coeducational classroom settings on the participation and performance of students in practical physical education. In A. Rendimiento (Ed.), Congreso de la asociacion internacional de escuelas superiores de educacion fisica (pp. 1016-1027).

Biddle, S., Braithwaite, R., & Pearson, N. (2014). The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity among young girls: A Meta-analysisPreventative Medicine, 62, 119-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.009

Billger, S. (2007). Does attending predominately female schools make a difference? Labor market outcomes for womenJournal of Economics and Finance31(2), 166-185.

Booth, A. (2014, October 13). Could girls be better off in single-sex schools? Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from:

Booth, A., Cardona-Sosa, L., and Nolen, P. (2013). Do single-sex classes affect exam scores? An experiment in a co-educational university. Australian National University Centre for Economic Policy Research. Discussion Paper No. 679, 1-21.

Booth, A., Cardona-Sosa, L., and Nolen, P. (2014). Gender differences in risk aversion: Do single-sex environments affect their development? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 99 (March 2014), 126-154.

Booth, A., Cardona-Sosa, L., and Nolen, P. (2018). Do single-sex classes affect academic achievement? An experiment in a coeducational university. Journal of Public Economics, 168, 109-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.08.016

Booth, A., & Nolen, P. (2009a). Gender differences in risk behaviour: Does nurture matter? IZA Discussion Paper No. 4026.

Booth, A., & Nolen, P. (2009b). Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? IZA Discussion Paper No. 4027.

Booth, A., & Nolen, P. (2014). Can risk-taking preferences be modified? Some experimental evidence. CESifo Working Paper No. 4571.

Bradley, K. (2009). An investigation of single-sex education and its impact on academic achievement, discipline referral frequency, and attendance for first and second grade public school students. Ph.D. dissertation, Mercer University, United States — Georgia. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3374139).

Buser, T., Niederle, M., & Oosterbeek, H. (2014). Gender, competitiveness, and career choicesQuarterly Journal of Economics129(3), 1409-1447. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qju009

Busolt, U., Ludewig, K., & Schmidt, S. (2018). Do single-sex educational programmes in STEM disciplines reduce drop-out rate of female students? In Pixel (Ed.), New Perspectives in Science Education (7th Conference Edition) (pp. 251-255). Florence, Italy: LibreriaUniversitaria.

Cabezas, V. (2010). Gender peer effects in school: does the gender of schools peers affect students’ achievement? Ph.D. dissertation. Columbia University: New York. Retrieved March 16, 2011, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3420752).

Carnemolla, P. (2019, March). Girls’ perceptions of the construction industry: Building a picture of who isn’t interested in a career in construction and why. Retrieved from National Association of Women in Construction website:

Cherney, I., & Campbell, K. (2011). A league of their own: Do single-sex schools increase girls’ participation in the physical sciences? Sex Roles, 65, 712-724. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-0013-6

Cools, A., Fernández, R., & Patacchini, E. (2019, April). Girls, boys, and high achievers. Discussion Paper No. 12314. IZA Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved from:

Connolly, H. (2022). Stereotypes and sexism: The views and experiences of SA school students (Project Report No. 28). Commissioner for Young Children & Young People, South Australia. 

Cribb, V., & Haase, A. (2016). Girls feeling good at school: School gender environment, internalization and awareness of socio-cultural attitudes associations with self-esteem in adolescent girlsJournal of Adolescence, 46, 107-114 (published online 1 January 2016). DOI:

Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2019, March 27). STEM jobs are growing faster than other jobs. Retrieved from:

Diaconu, D. (2012). Modeling science achievement differences between single-sex and coeducational schools: Analyses from Hong Kong, SAR and New Zealand from TIMSS 1995, 1999, and 2003. PhD thesis, Boston College (Lynch School of Education), Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts. Retrieved from:

Dix, K. (2017, September 28). Single-sex schooling and achievement outcomes. [rd] Research Developments. Published byAustralian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Retrieved from:

Dix, K. (2018). Single-sex schooling and girls’ achievement in Australia. Presented at the Alliance of Girls’ Schools Australasia Educators Conference 2018, Adelaide. Published by Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Retrieved from:

Docherty, P. D., Chase, J. G., Fox, W. H., Naswell, K., & Williamson, P. (2018). Where do New Zealand female engineers come from? Insights from a quantitative analysis. 29th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from:

Dustmann, C., Ku, H., & Kwak, D.W. (2017, June 17). Why are single-sex schools successful? Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Discussion Paper DP12101. London: CEPR.

Dustmann, C., Ku, H. & Kwak, D.W. (2017, September 28). Why single-sex schools are more successful. VOX (Centre for Economic Policy Research Policy Portal). Retrieved from:

Eisenkopf, G., Hessami, Z., Fischbacher, U., & Ursrung, H. (2011). Academic performance and single-sex schooling: evidence from a natural experiment in SwitzerlandCESIFO Working Paper No. 3592. Retrieved from Centre for Economic Studies website:

Eisenkopf, G., Hessami, Z., Fischbacher U., & Ursprung, H. (2015). Academic performance and single-sex schooling: Evidence from a natural experiment in Switzerland. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 123-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.004

Fisher, J., Lang, C., & Forgasz, H. (2015, April 22). Girls gain confidence with IT when boys aren’t aroundThe Conversation. Retrieved from:

Fitzsimmons, T., Yates, M., & Callan, V. (2018). Hands up for Gender Equality: A Major Study into Confidence and Career Intentions of Adolescent Boys and Girls. Brisbane: AIBE Centre for Gender Equality in the Workplace, The University of Queensland.

Fitzsimmons, T. W., Yates, M. S., & Callan, V. J. (2021). Lean in? The role of single-sex schools in the gendering of confidence in high school adolescents. Australian Journal of Career Development, 30(2), 139-149. DOI: 10.1177/10384162211012045

Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. (2017, October). Single-sex versus co-educational schooling and STEM pathways: Final report. Melbourne: Monash University.

Gandara, F., & Silva, M. (2015). Understanding the gender gap in science and engineering: Evidence from the Chilean college admissions tests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, published online 9 April 2015, [1-14]. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-015-9637-2

Gee, K. A., & Cho, R. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex versus coeducational schools on adolescent peer victimization and perpetration. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1237-1251. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.08.011

Gemici, S., Lim, P., & Karmel, T. (2013). The impact of schools on young people’s transition to university. Adelaide: NCVER.

Gibb, S., Fergusson D. M., Horwood, L. J. (2008). Effects of single-sex and coeducational schooling on the gender gap in educational achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 52(3), 301-317. Retrieved from:

Gilmore, L., Patton, W., McCrindle, A., & Lee, C. (2002). Single-sex classes in a Queensland primary school: An evaluation of outcomes. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 19(1), 49-58. Retrieved from:

‘Girls 75% more likely to take maths if they go to a single-sex private school’. (2013, November 20). Evening Standard. Retrieved from:

Gísladóttir, B. & Pálsdóttir, H. (2017). Rannsókn á Hjallastefnunni: Unnin á vegum Háskólans í Reykjavík fyrir Hjallastefnuna á ĺslandi, 2014-2016. Reykjavík, Iceland: Reykjavík University.

Hart, L. (2015). Benefits beyond achievement? A comparison of academic attitudes and school satisfaction for adolescent girls in single-gender and coeducational classroomsMiddle Grades Research Journal, 10(2), 33-48.

Hart, L. (2016). When “separate” may be better: Exploring single-sex learning as a remedy for social anxieties in female middle school students. Middle School Journal, 47(2), 32-40. DOI: 10.1080/00940771.2016.1124660

Hannay, T. (2016, January 27). Single-sex schools: cui bono? SchoolDash. Retrieved from:

Hill, A. (2015). The girl next door: The effect of opposite gender friends on high school achievementAmerican Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(3), 147-177. DOI: 10.1257/app.20140030

Holmgren, R. (2014). Steeped in Learning: The student experience at all-girls’ schools. Charlottesville, VA: National Coalition of Girls’ Schools.

Huguet, P., & Regner, I. (2007). Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 545-560. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.545

Institute of Physics. (2012). It’s different for girls: The influence of schools. Retrieved from Institute of Physics [IOP] website:

Institute of Physics. (2013). Closing doors: Exploring gender and subject choice in schools. Retrieved from:

Institute of Physics. (2015). Opening doors: A guide to good practice in countering gender stereotyping in schools. Retrieved from:

Jackson, C. K. (2016, May). The effect of single-sex education on academic outcomes and crime: Fresh evidence from low-performing schools in Trinidad and Tobago. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 22222. Retrieved from:

Johnson, D., & Gastic, B. (2014). Patterns of bullying in single-sex schools. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(2), 126-136. DOI: 10.1007/s13178-014-0146-9

Justman, M. & Méndez, S. (2018). Gendered choices of STEM subjects for matriculation are not driven by prior differences in mathematical achievement. Economics of Education Review, 64, 282-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.02.002

Kim, S, Bryn Austin, S., Subramanian, S, Thomas, J., Eddy, K,, Franko, D, Rodgers, R., & Kawachi, I. (2018). Risk factors for disordered weight control behaviors among Korean adolescents: Multilevel analysis of the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Survey. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51, 124-138. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22820

Kim, D. H., & Law, H. (2012). Gender gap in maths test scores in South Korea and Hong Kong: Role of family background and single-sex schooling. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 92-103 (downloaded version unpaginated). Retrieved from:

Kim, Y., & Kawachi, I. (2016). School and individual-level predictors of weight status misperception among Korean adolescents: A national online survey. PLos ONE, 11(5), e0154826. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154826

Koniewski, M. & Hawrot, A. (2021). Are single-sex schools more effective than coed ones? The effect of single-sex schooling on achievement among female adolescents in Catholic schools. Research Papers in Education. DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2021.1886318

Laury, S., Lee, D., & Schnier, K. (2019). Will girls be girls? Risk taking and competition in an all-girls school. Economic Inquiry, first published online 28 February 2019, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12765

Lee, K., & Anderson, J. (2015). Gender differences in mathematics attitudes in coeducational and single sex secondary education, in M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds), Mathematics education in the margins, (pp. 357-364). Sunshine Coast, Queensland: MERGA. Retrieved from:

Li, X. & Kuan, P-Y. (2018, May 25-27). The effect of single-sex schooling on high school girls’ curriculum tracking selection in Taiwan. Paper presented to the 2018 Spring Meeting of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC28) of the International Sociological Association, Yongsei University, Seoul, Korea. (Note: This paper has been cited with the permission of the authors.)

Link, S. (2012). Single-sex schooling and student performance: Quasi-experimental evidence from South Korea. IFO Working Paper No. 146. Munich: IFO Institute. Retrieved from:

Lu, L., & Rickard, K. (2014). Value added models for NSW government schools. NSW: Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, NSW Department of Education and Communities. Retrieved from:

Lyu, M., & Gill, D. (2011). Perceived physical competence, enjoyment and effort in same‐sex and coeducational physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 31(2), 247-260. Retrieved from:

Macquarie Marketing Group (MMG) and the Alliance of Girls’ Schools Australasia. (2020). The girls’ school edge: A comparison of outcomes for girls from single-sex and co-educational schools using PISA data. Published by the Alliance of Girls’ Schools Australasia.

Mather, J., & Tadros, E. (2014, June 7). Australia’s maths crisis. Retrieved from:

McCulloch, K. (n.d.). The Australian maths crisis. Retrieved from:

Mission Australia. (2020). Youth Survey Report 2020: Data breakdown for the Alliance of Girls’ Schools Australasia. Adelaide: Mission Australia.

Morgan, K., Van Godwin, J., Darwent, K., & Fildes, A. (2019). Formative research to develop a school-based, community-linked physical activity role model programme for girls: CHoosing Active Role Models to INspire Girls (CHARMING). BMC Public Health19(1), 437. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6741-1

Morrell, P. (2009). Single-sex classroom implementation in a predominantly low-income, public, urban elementary school: Perceptions, engagement, and achievement. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York. Retrieved from:

National Center for Education Statistics [US]. (n.d.) Private School Universe Survey. Retrieved from:

National Education Union and UK Feminista. (2017). “It’s just everywhere”: A study on sexism in schools — and how we tackle it. Retrieved from NEU website:

OECD. (2023). Education policy outlook in Australia. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:

Ofsted [Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills]. (2021, June 10.) Review of sexual abuse in schools and colleges. Report downloaded from:

Ontario Education Research Exchange. (n.d.). Gender stereotypes and musical instruments. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. Retrieved from:

Pahlke, E., Hyde, J., & Allison, C. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140 (4), 1042-1072. DOI: 10.1037/a0035740

Panizzon, D., Geer, R., Paige, K., O’Keeffe, L., Schultz, L., Zeegers, Y., & Brown, L. (2018). Exploring the ‘hard facts’ around STEM in Australia: Females, low socioeconomic status and absenteeism. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(8), 30-44. Retrieved from:

Paredes, V. (2021). Mixed but not scrambled: Gender gaps in coed schools with single-sex classroom. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. Published online 30 September 2021, pp. 1-37. DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2021.1966860

Park, H., Behrman, J., & Choi, J. (2012). Causal effects of single-sex schools on college entrance exams and college attendance: Random assignment in Seoul high schools. PSC Working Paper Series, PSC 10-01. Retrieved from:

Paton, G., and Moore, M. (2009, March 18). Girls ‘do better in single-sex schools’The Telegraph. Retrieved from:

Patterson, D., & Collins, J. (2012). Middle school girls’ perceptions of their physical education classes and teachers. Medicina Sportiva, 16(1), 12-16. doi: 10.5604/17342260.987843

Pritchard, T., McCollum, S., Sundal, J., & Colquit, G. (2014). Effect of the Sport Education Tactical Model on coeducational and single gender game performance. The Physical Educator, 71, 132-154. Available at:

Priyadarshani, K.L.G. (2018). Identifying the influential factors on academic performance of single sex education system and co-education system: A case study (unpublished Master of Science thesis). University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.

Pustejovsky, J. (2019, August). Policy brief: A study of all-girls secondary schools supported by the Young Women’s Preparatory Network in Texas School Districts. Texas: Education Research Center, University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from:

Rawlings, J. (2015). The effect of middle school music ensemble participation on the relationship between perceived school connectedness, self-reported bullying behaviors, and peer victimization. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan. Retrieved from:

Riggers-Piehl, T., Lim, G., & King, K. (2018, December). Fostering academic and social engagement: An investigation into the effects of all-girls education in the transition to university. Executive summary.  Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute (HERI), University of California (UCLA).

Riordan, C., Faddis, B., Beam, M., Seagar, A., Tanney, A., & Valentine, J. (2008). Early implementation of public single-sex schools: Perceptions and characteristics. Report prepared by RMC Research Corporation for the US Department of Education. Jessup, Maryland: US Department of Education. Retrieved from:

Roberts, K. (2014). Engaging more women and girls in mathematics and STEM fields: The international evidence. Report prepared for the Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. Retrieved from:

Robinson, D. B., Mitton, J., Hadley, G., & Kettley, M. (2021) Single-sex education in the 21st century: A 20-year scoping review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103462

Ryan, C. (2016, August). The attitudes of boys and girls towards science and mathematics as they progress through school. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 24/16. Melbourne: Melbourne University. Retrieved from:

Sax, L, Arms, E., Woodruff, M., Riggers, T., & Egan, K. (2009). Women graduates of single-sex and coeducational high schools: differences in their characteristics and their transition to college. Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies. Retrieved from:

Schmitt, A., Atencio, M., & Sempé, G. (2020). “If I’m sailing with a girl, I get identified as a ‘marshmallow'”: Gendered practices of school sport sailing in Western France and California. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 1-19. DOI: 10.1177/1012690219897549

Schneeweis, N., & Zweimuller, M. (2012). Girls, girls, girls: Gender composition and female school choiceEconomics of Education Review, 31(4), 482-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.11.002

Shøne, P., von Simson, K., & Strøm, M. (2017, February). Girls helping girls: The impact of female peers on grades and educational choices. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10586. Bonn, Germany: IZA Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved from:

Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., & Tumen, S. (2008). Individual and school factors affecting students’ participation and success in higher educationHigher Education, 56(5), 613-632.

Shute, R. (2017, first published online 2021). A test in the high school context of Berdahl’s status theory of sex-based harassment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1-2), 735-752. DOI: 10.1177/0886260517734862

Shute, R., Owens, L., & Slee, P. (2016). High school girls’ experience of victimization by boys: Where sexual harassment meets aggression. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 25(3), 269-285. DOI: 10.1080/10926771.2015.1129656

Skital, E. & Tîru, L.-G. (2021). The relationship between classroom type (single-sex or mixed-sex) and the academic achievements in mathematics among students belonging to the National-Religious Society in Israel. European Review of Applied Sociology, 14(22), 31-42. DOI: 10.1515/eras-2021-004

Smith, S. (2018, October 4). Iceland’s answer to gender equality: Compensate for differences between boys, girls. NBC News. Retrieved from:

South Australian Association of State School Organisations Inc. (2016). SAASSO Survey 5: All Girl Schools. Retrieved from

Spears Brown, C. (2019). Sexualised gender stereotypes predict girls’ academic self-efficacy and motivation across middle school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(6), 523-529. DOI: 10.1177/0165025419862361

Spencer, B., Barrett, C., Storti, G., & Cole, M. (2013). “Only girls who want fat legs take the elevator”: Body image in single-sex and mixed-sex colleges. Sex Roles, 69(7), 469–479. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-012-0189-4

Spencer-Ernandez, J. & George, L. (2016). Single-sex vs. co-educational high schools: Performance of Caribbean students across school types in mathematics on the Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate. Caribbean Educational Research Journal, 4(2), 96-121.

Spielhofer, T., Benton, T., & Schagen S. (2004). A study of the effects of school size and single-sex education in English schools. Research Papers in Education, 19(2), 133-159. DOI: 1080/02671520410001695407

Stannard, K. (2018, August). Girls-only education: The GDST perspective. London, UK: Girls’ Day School Trust.

Sullivan, A. (2009). Academic self-concept, gender and single-sex schoolingBritish Educational Research Journal35(2), 259-288. DOI: 10.1080/01411920802042960

Sullivan, A., Joshi, H., & Leonard, D. (2008). Single-sex schooling and academic attainment at school and through the life course. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University of London.

Sullivan, A., Joshi, H., & Leonard, D. (2010). Single-sex schooling and academic attainment at school and through the lifecourse. American Educational Research Journal47(1), 6-36. DOI: 10.3102/0002831209350106

Sullivan, A., Joshi, H., & Leonard, D. (2011). Single‐sex schooling and labour market outcomes. Oxford Review of Education, 37(3), 311-332. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2010.545194

Sullivan, L., Ballen, C., & Cotner, S. (2018). Small group gender ratios impact biology class performance and peer evaluations. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0195129. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195129

Timken, G., McNamee, J., & Coste, S. (2019). ‘It doesn’t seem like PE and I love it’: Adolescent girls’ views of a health club physical education approach. European Physical Education Review, 25(1), 109-124. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X17706382

Titze, C., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2011). Single-sex school girls outperform girls attending a co-educative school in mental rotation accuracySex Roles. Published online. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-9947-y

Tran, K. M. (2018). The role of performance and gender in subjects, university degrees, and occupational choices (unpublished honours thesis). University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland.

Tully, D., & Jacobs, B. (2010). Effects of single-gender mathematics classroom on self-perception of mathematical ability and post secondary engineering paths: An Australian case studyEuropean Journal of Engineering Education35(4), 455-467. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2010.489940

Vargos, C. (2017). The effects of single-sex versus coeducational physical education on junior high physical activity levels and self-competence. Master of Science Thesis, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois. Retrieved from:

Wallace, L., Buchan, D., & Sculthorpe, N. (2020). A comparison of activity levels of girls in single-gender and mixed-gender physical education. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 231-240. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X19849456

Walters, L. (2015, October 22). Single-sex schools offer girls more and deliver higher paid futures: Principal. Retrieved from:

Wang, Y. H. (2017). Breaking the gendered-technology phenomenon in Taiwan’s higher education. Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on E-Learning (Lisbon, Portugal, July 20-22, 2017), 154-158. Retrieved from:

Watson, C., Quatman, T., & Edler, E. (2002). Career aspirations of adolescent girls: Effects of achievement level, grade, and single-sex school environment. Sex Roles46(9), 323-335.

Whitlock, Sharon E. (2006).  The effects of single-sex and coeducational environments on the self-efficacy of middle school girls. Ed.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States — Virginia. Retrieved September 24, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3241184).

Whittington, A., Nixon Mack, E., Budbill, N., & McKenney, P. (2011). All-girls adventure programmes: what are the benefits? Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 11(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1080/14729679.2010.505817

Wilson, S. (2015, February 25). Teachers’ gender bias in maths affects girls later. Retrieved from:

Women and Equalities Committee, House of Commons [UK]. (2016, September 13). ‘Widespread’ sexual harassment and violence in school must be tackled. Retrieved from:

Women and Equalities Committee, House of Commons [UK]. (2016). Sexual harassment and sexual violence in schools. Third Report of Session 2016-17. Westminster, London: House of Commons [UK]. Retrieved from:

Wong, K., Lam, Y. R., & Ho, L. (2002). The effects of schooling on gender differences. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 827-843. Retrieved from:

Woodward, L., Fergusson, D., & Horwood L. (1999). The effects of single-sex and coeducational secondary schooling on children’s academic achievement. Retrieved from:

Younger, M. (2016, September). Effective pedagogies for girls’ learning: A review of recent research. London: Girls’ Day School Trust (GDST). Retrieved from: